
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to check if an email address exists without sending an email?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webdigi.co.uk/blog/2009/how-to-check-if-an-email-address-exists-without-sending-an-email/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webdigi.co.uk/blog/2009/how-to-check-if-an-email-address-exists-without-sending-an-email/</link>
	<description>Little words of wisdom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 23:02:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://www.webdigi.co.uk/blog/2009/how-to-check-if-an-email-address-exists-without-sending-an-email/comment-page-2/#comment-17394</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 20:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdigi.co.uk/blog/?p=19#comment-17394</guid>
		<description>Well.... this is a nice feature to have. Though you should only use it to hint the user to pay extra close attention to their input. As this method of validation is not failsafe, you should only indicate a possibly incorrect email address, and not blocking the user from using it anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230;. this is a nice feature to have. Though you should only use it to hint the user to pay extra close attention to their input. As this method of validation is not failsafe, you should only indicate a possibly incorrect email address, and not blocking the user from using it anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MySQL programmer</title>
		<link>http://www.webdigi.co.uk/blog/2009/how-to-check-if-an-email-address-exists-without-sending-an-email/comment-page-2/#comment-17243</link>
		<dc:creator>MySQL programmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdigi.co.uk/blog/?p=19#comment-17243</guid>
		<description>This is nice posting. Its helping to many friends say to me.
Doing good..

Thanks a lot..!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is nice posting. Its helping to many friends say to me.<br />
Doing good..</p>
<p>Thanks a lot..!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: r.davison</title>
		<link>http://www.webdigi.co.uk/blog/2009/how-to-check-if-an-email-address-exists-without-sending-an-email/comment-page-2/#comment-16949</link>
		<dc:creator>r.davison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 15:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdigi.co.uk/blog/?p=19#comment-16949</guid>
		<description>nick 9th june is so right I am always having this problem</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nick 9th june is so right I am always having this problem</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.webdigi.co.uk/blog/2009/how-to-check-if-an-email-address-exists-without-sending-an-email/comment-page-2/#comment-16838</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 07:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdigi.co.uk/blog/?p=19#comment-16838</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just had an odd situation. I was buying an Apple product through Apple Finance (Barclays Bank). The tool they use to process the application validates the email address before accepting it. It failed to validate my email address on harper.org.uk and it also failed to validate my google mail address. I&#039;ve also had issue with other companies attempting to validate email addresses and this validation failing for these two domains, particularly Vodafone&#039;s Blackberry servers and an electronic magazine that I have attempted to subscribe to. There appears to be a common problem out there with email validation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just had an odd situation. I was buying an Apple product through Apple Finance (Barclays Bank). The tool they use to process the application validates the email address before accepting it. It failed to validate my email address on harper.org.uk and it also failed to validate my google mail address. I&#8217;ve also had issue with other companies attempting to validate email addresses and this validation failing for these two domains, particularly Vodafone&#8217;s Blackberry servers and an electronic magazine that I have attempted to subscribe to. There appears to be a common problem out there with email validation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://www.webdigi.co.uk/blog/2009/how-to-check-if-an-email-address-exists-without-sending-an-email/comment-page-2/#comment-16832</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 21:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdigi.co.uk/blog/?p=19#comment-16832</guid>
		<description>One again, your idea is very 

good.thank you!very much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One again, your idea is very </p>
<p>good.thank you!very much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: babor_7uiu</title>
		<link>http://www.webdigi.co.uk/blog/2009/how-to-check-if-an-email-address-exists-without-sending-an-email/comment-page-2/#comment-16804</link>
		<dc:creator>babor_7uiu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 10:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdigi.co.uk/blog/?p=19#comment-16804</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing. It&#039;s important information for SEO people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing. It&#8217;s important information for SEO people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jitin dhingra</title>
		<link>http://www.webdigi.co.uk/blog/2009/how-to-check-if-an-email-address-exists-without-sending-an-email/comment-page-2/#comment-16363</link>
		<dc:creator>jitin dhingra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 04:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdigi.co.uk/blog/?p=19#comment-16363</guid>
		<description>Hello Everyone,

I want to validate my bunch of email addresses, some free softwares can validate only max 50 email id&#039;s at one go and takes time for validation. Can any one of you tell me if you have any such software which is available free and validate my email ids, your support will be appreciated. thanks a bunch in advance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Everyone,</p>
<p>I want to validate my bunch of email addresses, some free softwares can validate only max 50 email id&#8217;s at one go and takes time for validation. Can any one of you tell me if you have any such software which is available free and validate my email ids, your support will be appreciated. thanks a bunch in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keith</title>
		<link>http://www.webdigi.co.uk/blog/2009/how-to-check-if-an-email-address-exists-without-sending-an-email/comment-page-2/#comment-15341</link>
		<dc:creator>keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdigi.co.uk/blog/?p=19#comment-15341</guid>
		<description>In real terms the function:
$emailIsValid = filter_var($email, FILTER_VALIDATE_EMAIL);

doesnt work (does what is says on the tin but doesnt &#039;check).  This will allow anything that sits within standard.  That means that anything that is correctly formatted will go through, doesnt have to be an actual valid address.  For example xxx@staleproperty.com.uk will go through, it is valid because the RFC defines this as ok (allowing for future growth in the standard) but the reality is it is not valid because &#039;.com.uk&#039; is not a valid base domain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In real terms the function:<br />
$emailIsValid = filter_var($email, FILTER_VALIDATE_EMAIL);</p>
<p>doesnt work (does what is says on the tin but doesnt &#8216;check).  This will allow anything that sits within standard.  That means that anything that is correctly formatted will go through, doesnt have to be an actual valid address.  For example <a href="mailto:xxx@staleproperty.com.uk">xxx@staleproperty.com.uk</a> will go through, it is valid because the RFC defines this as ok (allowing for future growth in the standard) but the reality is it is not valid because &#8216;.com.uk&#8217; is not a valid base domain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theo Hubenet</title>
		<link>http://www.webdigi.co.uk/blog/2009/how-to-check-if-an-email-address-exists-without-sending-an-email/comment-page-2/#comment-13841</link>
		<dc:creator>Theo Hubenet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdigi.co.uk/blog/?p=19#comment-13841</guid>
		<description>For all of your peoples information... I see many regular expression checks that do not correctly check the domain extension length, for example the .museum domainname extension length is 6 characters and the minimum length is two:
function check_email($email) {
$rx =&quot;^[_a-z0-9-]+(\.[_a-z0-9-]+)*@[a-z0-9-]+(\.[a-z0-9-]+)*(\.[a-z]{2,8})$&quot;;
return eregi($rx,$email);
}</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For all of your peoples information&#8230; I see many regular expression checks that do not correctly check the domain extension length, for example the .museum domainname extension length is 6 characters and the minimum length is two:<br />
function check_email($email) {<br />
$rx =&#8221;^[_a-z0-9-]+(\.[_a-z0-9-]+)*@[a-z0-9-]+(\.[a-z0-9-]+)*(\.[a-z]{2,8})$&#8221;;<br />
return eregi($rx,$email);<br />
}</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MLM Software Cochin</title>
		<link>http://www.webdigi.co.uk/blog/2009/how-to-check-if-an-email-address-exists-without-sending-an-email/comment-page-2/#comment-13496</link>
		<dc:creator>MLM Software Cochin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdigi.co.uk/blog/?p=19#comment-13496</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the great information. I have been searching for this question and finally got it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the great information. I have been searching for this question and finally got it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
